RABBI DAVID ETENGOFF: PARASHAT HASHAVUAH
  • Blog: Rabbi David Etengoff: Parashat HaShavuah
  • Sefer Bereishit 5784&5785
  • Sefer Shemot 5784&5785
  • Sefer Vayikra 5784&5785
  • Sefer Bamidbar 5784 &5785
  • Sefer Devarim 5784&5785
  • Sefer Bereishit 5782&5783
  • Sefer Shemot 5782&5783
  • Sefer Vayikra 5782&5783
  • Sefer Bamidbar 5782&5783
  • Sefer Devarim 5782&5783
  • Sefer Bereishit 5780& 5781
  • Sefer Shemot 5780&5781
  • Sefer Vayikra 5780&5781
  • Sefer Bamidbar 578&5781
  • Sefer Devarim 578&5781
  • Sefer Bereishit 5778&5779
  • Sefer Shemot 5778&5779
  • Sefer Vayikra 5778&5779
  • Sefer Bamidbar 5778&5779
  • Sefer Devarim 5778&5779
  • Sefer Bereishit 5776&5777
  • Sefer Bereishit 5774&5775
  • Sefer Bereishit 5772&5773
  • Sefer Bereishit 5771&5770
  • Sefer Shemot 5776&5777
  • Sefer Shemot 5774&5775
  • Sefer Shemot 5772&5773
  • Sefer Shemot 5771&5770
  • Sefer Vayikra 5776&5777
  • Sefer Vayikra 5774&5775
  • Sefer Vayikra 5772&5773
  • Sefer Vayikra 5771&5770
  • Sefer Bamidbar 5776&5777
  • Sefer Bamidbar 5774&5775
  • Sefer Bamidbar 5772&5773
  • Sefer Bamidbar 5771&5770
  • Sefer Devarim 5776&5777
  • Sefer Devarim 5774&5775
  • Sefer Devarim 5772&5773
  • Sefer Devarim 5771&5770

8/16/2020

Parashat Shoftim 5780, 2020: A Time for Introspection

0 Comments

Read Now
 
Picture

 
Rabbi David Etengoff
 
Dedicated to the sacred memories of my mother, Miriam Tovah bat Aharon Hakohen, father-in-law, Levi ben Yitzhak, sister-in-law, Ruchama Rivka Sondra bat Yechiel, sister, Shulamit bat Menachem, Chana bat Shmuel, Yehonatan Binyamin ben Mordechai Meir Halevi, Shoshana Elka bat Avraham, Tikvah bat Rivka Perel, Peretz ben Chaim, Chaya Sarah bat Reb Yechezkel Shraga, Shmuel Yosef ben Reuven, the Kedoshim of Har Nof, Pittsburgh, and Jersey City, and the refuah shlaimah of Mordechai HaLevi ben Miriam Tovah, Moshe ben Itta Golda, Yocheved Dafneh bat Dinah Zehavah, Reuven Shmuel ben Leah, Dovid Shmuel ben Chasiyah and the health and safety of our brothers and sisters in Israel and around the world.
 
This past week we celebrated Rosh Chodesh Elul — a major step toward our upcoming encounter with the Almighty on Rosh Hashanah. As such, Chodesh Elul emerges as the preeminent time to prepare ourselves to serve Hashem in an authentic and meaningful manner. The great Chasidic master, Rabbi Kalonymus Kalman Halevi Epstein (1753-1825), known as “the Maor Vashemesh” after the title of his work on the Torah and Festivals, addresses this crucial topic in his commentary on the first pasuk of our parasha:

An individual who wants to serve Hashem in truth — is obligated at all times to watch over his actions. This means that it is insufficient for him to merely refrain, G-d forbid, from performing an improper action — rather, [his obligation to be ever watchful] extends even over the positive actions that he performs, including his tefilah and Torah studies. [This means that] he must scrutinize them very carefully in order to ascertain whether or not they were performed with the proper measure of awe and love, and if they were completely pure and clear without any type of negative thought, or [performed] in the service of some personal agenda. (Sefer Devarim 16:18, translation and brackets my own)
 
In just a few short words, the Maor Vashemesh presents us with a blueprint for strengthening our relationship with Hakadosh Baruch Hu. He begins by teaching us that watchfulness is the key to living a spiritually-infused life. Next, he emphasizes that refraining from performing an untoward action, while clearly necessary, is an insufficient yardstick by which to measure ourselves. Instead, in order to truly serve Hashem, the Maor Vashemesh asserts that we must ensure that each of our positive actions are invested with the purest intentions, and with sincere awe and love.
 
The Maor Vashemesh then notes that his analysis is based upon the final words of a well-known passage in Talmud Bavli, Eruvin 13b:

Our Rabbis taught: For two and a half years Beit Shammai and Beit Hillel argued. One side said: “It would have been better if man had not been created rather than his having been created.” The other side claimed: “It is better that man was created rather than his having not been created.” They reached the following conclusion: “It is better that man should not have been created rather than his having been created. Now, however, that he was created, y’phashpfash b’ma’asuv — he should examine his actions.” An alternate text reads: y’mashmash b’ma’asuv — He should scrutinize his actions.”
 
What are the substantive differences that obtain between y’phashpfash, and y’mashmash, b’ma’asuv? We are fortunate that our Sages addressed this very question. The Aruch (Rabbi Yechiel ben Natan, 1035-1110) explains y’phashpfash b’ma’asuv as referring to careful inspection of one’s actions after having committed a sin. In contrast, y’mashmash b’ma’asuv, refers to examining one’s potential actions in order to ascertain whether or not they represent meritorious behavior. In theory, at least, these approaches should prevent a person from committing a chate (sin) or, at the very least, from repeating it. Rashi (1040-1105) follows the Aruch’s approach in reference to y’phashpfash b’ma’asuv, and significantly expands upon his analysis of y’mashmash b’ma’asuv:

y’mashmash b’ma’asuv – for example, if one has an opportunity to perform a mitzvah, he should consider the loss that will obtain due to its non-performance in light of the reward that would accrue as a result of its performance. He should, therefore, not put off its performance because of the [momentary] monetary expenditure, since its reward will surely come in the future. [Moreover,] if the possibility of performing a sin presents itself, he should carefully consider the “benefit” that will immediately accrue over and against the future loss for which he will have to make restitution.
 
Both the Aruch and Rashi aid us in understanding our terms. In my estimation, however, the most incisive analysis of y’phashpfash and y’mashmash b’ma’asuv can be found in Sefer Mesilat Yesharim, authored by Rabbi Moshe Chaim Luzzatto zatzal (1707-1746). Therein, he defines “pishpush” (the nounal form of y’phashpfash) as:

…to examine all of our actions, in general, and to carefully think about them. [To ascertain] if they contain therein deeds that we ought not to do that do not follow the ways of the commandments and statutes of Hashem. Any actions that fit [this negative criterion] should be destroyed from the world.
 
In contrast, he defines “mishmush” (the nounal form of y’mashmash) as:
 
…the careful and exact analysis of even good actions, to determine and see if they contain any aspect, whatsoever, that is not good or any bad feature that must be removed and destroyed…one must scrutinize his actions [in this fashion] to examine their innermost content, the purpose of this examination to [yield] actions that are pure and perfect. (Translations my own)
 
A careful reading of these sections from the Mesilat Yesharim reveals that the interpretation of the Maor Vashemesh echoes Rav Luzzato’s definition of mishmush. Since the historical record indicates that the Mesilat Yesharim was widely read and cherished by many Chasidic masters of his time it is very reasonable to assume that the Maor Vashemesh, as well, would have encountered and mastered this work, since this gem of ethical literature focuses upon numerous concepts and themes that continuously captured his attention.
 
May the guidance of these great Torah scholars enable us to examine and perfect our actions so that we may move ever closer to the Almighty, and return to Him in heartfelt and abiding teshuvah. V’chane yihi ratzon.
 
Shabbat Shalom, and may Hashem in His great mercy remove the magafah from klal Yisrael and from all the nations of the world.
 
Past drashot may be found at my blog-website: http://reparashathashavuah.org
They may also be found on http://www.yutorah.org using the search criteria Etengoff and the parasha’s name.
 
The email list, b’chasdei Hashem, has expanded to hundreds of people. I am always happy to add more members to the list. If you have family or friends you would like to have added, please do not hesitate to contact me via email mailto:[email protected].
 
*** My audio shiurim on the topics of Tefilah and Tanach may be found at: http://tinyurl.com/8hsdpyd
 
*** I have posted 164 of Rabbi Soloveitchik’s English language audio shiurim (MP3 format) spanning the years 1958-1984. Please click on the highlighted link.
 
​Parashat Shoftim 5780, 2020:
 
A Time for Introspection
 
Rabbi David Etengoff
 
Dedicated to the sacred memories of my mother, Miriam Tovah bat Aharon Hakohen, father-in-law, Levi ben Yitzhak, sister-in-law, Ruchama Rivka Sondra bat Yechiel, sister, Shulamit bat Menachem, Chana bat Shmuel, Yehonatan Binyamin ben Mordechai Meir Halevi, Shoshana Elka bat Avraham, Tikvah bat Rivka Perel, Peretz ben Chaim, Chaya Sarah bat Reb Yechezkel Shraga, Shmuel Yosef ben Reuven, the Kedoshim of Har Nof, Pittsburgh, and Jersey City, and the refuah shlaimah of Mordechai HaLevi ben Miriam Tovah, Moshe ben Itta Golda, Yocheved Dafneh bat Dinah Zehavah, Reuven Shmuel ben Leah, Dovid Shmuel ben Chasiyah and the health and safety of our brothers and sisters in Israel and around the world.
 
This past week we celebrated Rosh Chodesh Elul — a major step toward our upcoming encounter with the Almighty on Rosh Hashanah. As such, Chodesh Elul emerges as the preeminent time to prepare ourselves to serve Hashem in an authentic and meaningful manner. The great Chasidic master, Rabbi Kalonymus Kalman Halevi Epstein (1753-1825), known as “the Maor Vashemesh” after the title of his work on the Torah and Festivals, addresses this crucial topic in his commentary on the first pasuk of our parasha:
An individual who wants to serve Hashem in truth — is obligated at all times to watch over his actions. This means that it is insufficient for him to merely refrain, G-d forbid, from performing an improper action — rather, [his obligation to be ever watchful] extends even over the positive actions that he performs, including his tefilah and Torah studies. [This means that] he must scrutinize them very carefully in order to ascertain whether or not they were performed with the proper measure of awe and love, and if they were completely pure and clear without any type of negative thought, or [performed] in the service of some personal agenda. (Sefer Devarim 16:18, translation and brackets my own)
 
In just a few short words, the Maor Vashemesh presents us with a blueprint for strengthening our relationship with Hakadosh Baruch Hu. He begins by teaching us that watchfulness is the key to living a spiritually-infused life. Next, he emphasizes that refraining from performing an untoward action, while clearly necessary, is an insufficient yardstick by which to measure ourselves. Instead, in order to truly serve Hashem, the Maor Vashemesh asserts that we must ensure that each of our positive actions are invested with the purest intentions, and with sincere awe and love.
 
The Maor Vashemesh then notes that his analysis is based upon the final words of a well-known passage in Talmud Bavli, Eruvin 13b:
Our Rabbis taught: For two and a half years Beit Shammai and Beit Hillel argued. One side said: “It would have been better if man had not been created rather than his having been created.” The other side claimed: “It is better that man was created rather than his having not been created.” They reached the following conclusion: “It is better that man should not have been created rather than his having been created. Now, however, that he was created, y’phashpfash b’ma’asuv — he should examine his actions.” An alternate text reads: y’mashmash b’ma’asuv — He should scrutinize his actions.”
 
What are the substantive differences that obtain between y’phashpfash, and y’mashmash, b’ma’asuv? We are fortunate that our Sages addressed this very question. The Aruch (Rabbi Yechiel ben Natan, 1035-1110) explains y’phashpfash b’ma’asuv as referring to careful inspection of one’s actions after having committed a sin. In contrast, y’mashmash b’ma’asuv, refers to examining one’s potential actions in order to ascertain whether or not they represent meritorious behavior. In theory, at least, these approaches should prevent a person from committing a chate (sin) or, at the very least, from repeating it. Rashi (1040-1105) follows the Aruch’s approach in reference to y’phashpfash b’ma’asuv, and significantly expands upon his analysis of y’mashmash b’ma’asuv:
y’mashmash b’ma’asuv – for example, if one has an opportunity to perform a mitzvah, he should consider the loss that will obtain due to its non-performance in light of the reward that would accrue as a result of its performance. He should, therefore, not put off its performance because of the [momentary] monetary expenditure, since its reward will surely come in the future. [Moreover,] if the possibility of performing a sin presents itself, he should carefully consider the “benefit” that will immediately accrue over and against the future loss for which he will have to make restitution.
 
Both the Aruch and Rashi aid us in understanding our terms. In my estimation, however, the most incisive analysis of y’phashpfash and y’mashmash b’ma’asuv can be found in Sefer Mesilat Yesharim, authored by Rabbi Moshe Chaim Luzzatto zatzal (1707-1746). Therein, he defines “pishpush” (the nounal form of y’phashpfash) as:
…to examine all of our actions, in general, and to carefully think about them. [To ascertain] if they contain therein deeds that we ought not to do that do not follow the ways of the commandments and statutes of Hashem. Any actions that fit [this negative criterion] should be destroyed from the world.
 
In contrast, he defines “mishmush” (the nounal form of y’mashmash) as:
 
…the careful and exact analysis of even good actions, to determine and see if they contain any aspect, whatsoever, that is not good or any bad feature that must be removed and destroyed…one must scrutinize his actions [in this fashion] to examine their innermost content, the purpose of this examination to [yield] actions that are pure and perfect. (Translations my own)
 
A careful reading of these sections from the Mesilat Yesharim reveals that the interpretation of the Maor Vashemesh echoes Rav Luzzato’s definition of mishmush. Since the historical record indicates that the Mesilat Yesharim was widely read and cherished by many Chasidic masters of his time it is very reasonable to assume that the Maor Vashemesh, as well, would have encountered and mastered this work, since this gem of ethical literature focuses upon numerous concepts and themes that continuously captured his attention.
 
May the guidance of these great Torah scholars enable us to examine and perfect our actions so that we may move ever closer to the Almighty, and return to Him in heartfelt and abiding teshuvah. V’chane yihi ratzon.
 
Shabbat Shalom, and may Hashem in His great mercy remove the magafah from klal Yisrael and from all the nations of the world.
 
Past drashot may be found at my blog-website: http://reparashathashavuah.org
They may also be found on http://www.yutorah.org using the search criteria Etengoff and the parasha’s name.
 
The email list, b’chasdei Hashem, has expanded to hundreds of people. I am always happy to add more members to the list. If you have family or friends you would like to have added, please do not hesitate to contact me via email mailto:[email protected].
 
*** My audio shiurim on the topics of Tefilah and Tanach may be found at: http://tinyurl.com/8hsdpyd
 
*** I have posted 164 of Rabbi Soloveitchik’s English language audio shiurim (MP3 format) spanning the years 1958-1984. Please click on the highlighted link.


Share

0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

Details

    Archives

    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012

    Author

    Talmid of Rabbi Soloveitchik zatzal

    Categories

    All
    Parashat Hashavuah

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.
  • Blog: Rabbi David Etengoff: Parashat HaShavuah
  • Sefer Bereishit 5784&5785
  • Sefer Shemot 5784&5785
  • Sefer Vayikra 5784&5785
  • Sefer Bamidbar 5784 &5785
  • Sefer Devarim 5784&5785
  • Sefer Bereishit 5782&5783
  • Sefer Shemot 5782&5783
  • Sefer Vayikra 5782&5783
  • Sefer Bamidbar 5782&5783
  • Sefer Devarim 5782&5783
  • Sefer Bereishit 5780& 5781
  • Sefer Shemot 5780&5781
  • Sefer Vayikra 5780&5781
  • Sefer Bamidbar 578&5781
  • Sefer Devarim 578&5781
  • Sefer Bereishit 5778&5779
  • Sefer Shemot 5778&5779
  • Sefer Vayikra 5778&5779
  • Sefer Bamidbar 5778&5779
  • Sefer Devarim 5778&5779
  • Sefer Bereishit 5776&5777
  • Sefer Bereishit 5774&5775
  • Sefer Bereishit 5772&5773
  • Sefer Bereishit 5771&5770
  • Sefer Shemot 5776&5777
  • Sefer Shemot 5774&5775
  • Sefer Shemot 5772&5773
  • Sefer Shemot 5771&5770
  • Sefer Vayikra 5776&5777
  • Sefer Vayikra 5774&5775
  • Sefer Vayikra 5772&5773
  • Sefer Vayikra 5771&5770
  • Sefer Bamidbar 5776&5777
  • Sefer Bamidbar 5774&5775
  • Sefer Bamidbar 5772&5773
  • Sefer Bamidbar 5771&5770
  • Sefer Devarim 5776&5777
  • Sefer Devarim 5774&5775
  • Sefer Devarim 5772&5773
  • Sefer Devarim 5771&5770