RABBI DAVID ETENGOFF: PARASHAT HASHAVUAH
  • Blog: Rabbi David Etengoff: Parashat HaShavuah
  • Sefer Bereishit 5784&5785
  • Sefer Shemot 5784&5785
  • Sefer Vayikra 5784&5785
  • Sefer Bamidbar 5784 &5785
  • Sefer Devarim 5784&5785
  • Sefer Bereishit 5782&5783
  • Sefer Shemot 5782&5783
  • Sefer Vayikra 5782&5783
  • Sefer Bamidbar 5782&5783
  • Sefer Devarim 5782&5783
  • Sefer Bereishit 5780& 5781
  • Sefer Shemot 5780&5781
  • Sefer Vayikra 5780&5781
  • Sefer Bamidbar 578&5781
  • Sefer Devarim 578&5781
  • Sefer Bereishit 5778&5779
  • Sefer Shemot 5778&5779
  • Sefer Vayikra 5778&5779
  • Sefer Bamidbar 5778&5779
  • Sefer Devarim 5778&5779
  • Sefer Bereishit 5776&5777
  • Sefer Bereishit 5774&5775
  • Sefer Bereishit 5772&5773
  • Sefer Bereishit 5771&5770
  • Sefer Shemot 5776&5777
  • Sefer Shemot 5774&5775
  • Sefer Shemot 5772&5773
  • Sefer Shemot 5771&5770
  • Sefer Vayikra 5776&5777
  • Sefer Vayikra 5774&5775
  • Sefer Vayikra 5772&5773
  • Sefer Vayikra 5771&5770
  • Sefer Bamidbar 5776&5777
  • Sefer Bamidbar 5774&5775
  • Sefer Bamidbar 5772&5773
  • Sefer Bamidbar 5771&5770
  • Sefer Devarim 5776&5777
  • Sefer Devarim 5774&5775
  • Sefer Devarim 5772&5773
  • Sefer Devarim 5771&5770

6/23/2013

Parashat Pinchas 5773, 2013: "Obtaining Authentic Peace in Our Time"

1 Comment

Read Now
 
                        Parashat Pinchas 5773, 2013

                Obtaining Authentic Peace in Our Time

                            Rabbi David Etengoff

Dedicated to the sacred memories of my mother, Miriam Tovah bat Aharon Hakohen, father-in-law, Levi ben Yitzhak, sister-in-law, Ruchama Rivka Sondra, sister, Shulamit bat Menachem, Shifra bat Chaim Alter, and Yehonatan Binyamin ben Mordechai Meir Halevi, and the refuah shlaimah of Yosef Shmuel ben Miriam.

Human history is filled with the horrors of war. Unfortunately, while peace is held up as the greatest of objectives, pragmatic reality is quite a different matter. Shalom (Peace) is thus an ideal goal that has proven elusive since time immemorial. As such, the following verses in our parasha (Sefer Bamidbar 25:10-12) become all the more fascinating:

The L-rd spoke to Moses, saying: “Phinehas the son of Eleazar the son of Aaron the Kohen has turned My anger away from the children of Israel by his zealously avenging Me among them, so that I did not destroy the children of Israel because of My zeal.” Therefore, say, “I hereby give him My covenant of peace.” (This and all Bible translations, The Judaica Press Complete Tanach)

Who gave Pinchas his “covenant of peace?” What exactly is the meaning of “My covenant of peace?” What is the content of this promise? These are substantive questions that deserve meaningful and thoughtful responses. It is to this task that we now turn.

Who gave Pinchas his “covenant of peace?” The straightforward answer is that Hashem gave Pinchas this reward. The translation above certainly seems to support this direct reading. It appears, in fact, to be a quid pro quo, a middah keneged middah, that follows directly from Pinchas having “turned My anger away from the children of Israel by his zealously avenging Me among them, so that I did not destroy the children of Israel because of My zeal.” Rashi (1040-1105) suggests precisely this interpretation when he states: “That it should be a covenant of peace for him [i.e. Pinchas]. Just as a man owes gratitude and favor to someone who did him a favor, so here G-d expressed to Pinchas His feelings of peace.” (Brackets my own)

The Gemara in Talmud Bavli, Sanhedrin 82b, however, suggests an entirely different approach as to who gave Pinchas this “covenant of peace,” namely, Moshe and not Hashem: “Amar lei Hakadosh Baruch Hu:’ Hakdame lo shalom, shenemar “lechan emor heneni notan lo et briti shalom.’” (“The Holy One Blessed Be He said to Moshe: ‘You [Moshe] should welcome him [Pinchas] in peace. Consequently, the Torah states: “therefore let it be said [in general and by you Moshe] behold there is given to him [Pinchas] My covenant of peace,’” translation and brackets my own). The Kli Yakar, (Rabbeinu Shlomo Ephraim ben Aaron Luntschitz, 1550–1619), in his commentary on our pasuk (verse), underscores this approach:

Therefore the Torah states: “lechan emor heneni notan lo et briti shalom” (“therefore let it be said [in general and by you Moshe] behold there is given to him [Pinchas] My covenant of peace”) instead of the expected phrase: “lechan emor lo” (“therefore [Moshe] say [directly] to him [Pinchas]”) since the correct explanation is that Hakadosh Baruch Hu said to Moshe: “therefore say to all of the Jewish people in reference to yourself that you [Moshe] are giving him [Pinchas] my covenant of peace.” This was necessary so that the Jewish people would not say that Moshe was upset with Pinchas for not directly asking him the halacha [prior to his act of killing Zimri and Kasbi while they were engaged in their illicit activity]. Therefore, this was made known to the public when Hashem told him [Moshe] “you should state on your own behalf “heneni notan lo…” this phrase clearly refers to Moshe [and not to Hashem]. (Translation and brackets my own)

It is important, too, for us to understand the meaning of G-d’s promise to Pinchas of His “covenant of peace.” What is the content of this pledge? Here, as well, we find at least two different approaches. The Ibn Ezra (Rabbeinu Abraham ibn Ezra, 1092 – 1167) explains the need for this promise in the following manner:

The reason for the phrase “My covenant, the covenant of peace” (“et briti brit shalom”) is similar in kind to the phrase “kisacha Elokim” (“Your throne, O judge, [will exist] forever and ever; the scepter of equity is the scepter of your kingdom, Sefer Tehillim, 45:7). There are many other examples [in the Bible] like this. The reason for this pledge was so that Pinchas would not be afraid of Zimri’s kinsmen since Zimri had been the prince of his family. (Translation and brackets my own)

This mode of interpretation is followed by the 12th century Northern French commentator Rabbeinu Bechor Shor (Rabbi Yosef ben Yitzhak): “He [Pinchas] had nothing to fear. Neither from Zimri’s relatives, even though he had been a prince, nor from Kasbi’s relatives even though she was a king’s daughter.”

The Netziv, (Rabbeinu Naphtali Tzvi Yehudah Berlin, 1817-1893), in his seminal Torah commentary known as the Haamek Davar, offers a unique and deeply psychological insight as to why “My covenant of peace” is promised to Pinchas. As noted above, both the Ibn Ezra and the Bechor Shor focus upon Pinchas’ potential fear of others and the revenge that they might have sought against him.  In contrast, the Netziv focuses upon the fundamental changes that could have affected Pinchas’ personality as a result of his heroic and halachically-mandated act. He suggests that Pinchas could have been changed forevermore by the experience of having killed Zimri and Kasbi, even though they were unquestionably subject to the death penalty for their horrific deed. This, therefore, was why he needed Hashem’s “covenant of peace”:

In reward for his having removed Hakadosh Baruch Hu’s anger and fury from the Jewish people, he was blessed with the quality of peace – in order that he should not have consternation and be mortally afraid. This was necessary since the nature of the act in which Pinchas had been engaged required him to kill someone with his own hands. This could have brought about a change in his personality that would have caused him to become vicious and unfeeling toward others. Since, however, everything he did was for the purpose of serving Hashem, based upon [his purity of intention and singular purpose of soul], he was rewarded with the blessing that he would live ever afterward in [psychological] comfort [and sensitivity toward others] and with the quality of peace. The action that he had undertaken would not, therefore, pervert his personality. (Translation, underlining, and brackets my own)

We live in a world of terrorism and war, replete with countless acts of man’s inhumanity to his fellow man. It is far too easy for us to become inured and insensitive to the body counts of United States’ and Israeli soldiers who die defending our countries, our freedom, and our way of life. We, therefore, no less that Pinchas, need Hakadosh Baruch Hu’s “covenant of peace” as interpreted by the Netziv. We need to be sensitive to the heartbreaking tragedy of the death or maiming of even one soldier or civilian. We need, in short, to remember the sanctity of life and the uniqueness that Hashem bestows upon each and every individual. In short, we too, need Pinchas’ blessing.

May we all merit Hashem’s “covenant of peace,” and may we become sensitive to our fellow man and recognize each individual’s unique place within G-d’s creation. If we can achieve this goal, then we, like Pinchas, will “live ever afterward in [psychological] comfort [and sensitivity toward others] and with the quality of peace.” Surely, this will help bring Mashiach Tzidkeinu (our righteous Messiah) soon and in our days. V’chane yihi ratzon.

Shabbat Shalom

Past drashot may be found at my blog-website: http://reparashathashavuah.org

The email list, b’chasdei Hashem, has expanded to hundreds of people. I am always happy to add more members to the list. If you have family or friends you would like to have added, please do not hesitate to contact me via email [email protected].

*** My audio shiurim for Women on “Tefilah: Haskafah and Analysis,” may be found at: http://tinyurl.com/8hsdpyd

*** I have posted 164 of Rabbi Soloveitchik’s English language audio shiurim (MP3 format) spanning the years 1958-1984. They are available here: http://tinyurl.com/82pgvfn.

** Follow new postings on my Twitter accounts: @theRavZatzal and @Torahtech613.

*** Interested in 21st Century Jewish Education? See my blog: http://21stcenturyjewisheducation.org

*** Interested in the latest Educational Technology stories? See my Educational Technology – Yeshiva Edition Page at: http://www.scoop.it/t/educational-technology-yeshiva-edition.

Share

1 Comment
Strippers Buena Park link
10/14/2013 02:11:43 pm

Which template is this for your blog?

Reply



Leave a Reply.

Details

    Archives

    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012

    Author

    Talmid of Rabbi Soloveitchik zatzal

    Categories

    All
    Parashat Hashavuah

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.
  • Blog: Rabbi David Etengoff: Parashat HaShavuah
  • Sefer Bereishit 5784&5785
  • Sefer Shemot 5784&5785
  • Sefer Vayikra 5784&5785
  • Sefer Bamidbar 5784 &5785
  • Sefer Devarim 5784&5785
  • Sefer Bereishit 5782&5783
  • Sefer Shemot 5782&5783
  • Sefer Vayikra 5782&5783
  • Sefer Bamidbar 5782&5783
  • Sefer Devarim 5782&5783
  • Sefer Bereishit 5780& 5781
  • Sefer Shemot 5780&5781
  • Sefer Vayikra 5780&5781
  • Sefer Bamidbar 578&5781
  • Sefer Devarim 578&5781
  • Sefer Bereishit 5778&5779
  • Sefer Shemot 5778&5779
  • Sefer Vayikra 5778&5779
  • Sefer Bamidbar 5778&5779
  • Sefer Devarim 5778&5779
  • Sefer Bereishit 5776&5777
  • Sefer Bereishit 5774&5775
  • Sefer Bereishit 5772&5773
  • Sefer Bereishit 5771&5770
  • Sefer Shemot 5776&5777
  • Sefer Shemot 5774&5775
  • Sefer Shemot 5772&5773
  • Sefer Shemot 5771&5770
  • Sefer Vayikra 5776&5777
  • Sefer Vayikra 5774&5775
  • Sefer Vayikra 5772&5773
  • Sefer Vayikra 5771&5770
  • Sefer Bamidbar 5776&5777
  • Sefer Bamidbar 5774&5775
  • Sefer Bamidbar 5772&5773
  • Sefer Bamidbar 5771&5770
  • Sefer Devarim 5776&5777
  • Sefer Devarim 5774&5775
  • Sefer Devarim 5772&5773
  • Sefer Devarim 5771&5770